http://www.softperfect.com/board/index.php EN Thu, 11 Mar 2010 21:34:12 -0500 Thu, 11 Mar 2010 21:34:12 -0500 SoftPerfect Research Forum Phorum 5.1.25 60 http://www.softperfect.com/board/read.php?7,7894,9118#msg-9118 moro666

I feel that too !!!!!! :S
I hope not.]]> SoftPerfect Bandwidth Manager http://www.softperfect.com/board/read.php?7,7894,9118#msg-9118 Thu, 11 Mar 2010 21:34:12 -0500 http://www.softperfect.com/board/read.php?8,9116,9117#msg-9117 MichaelG NetWorx http://www.softperfect.com/board/read.php?8,9116,9117#msg-9117 Thu, 11 Mar 2010 21:08:57 -0500 http://www.softperfect.com/board/read.php?8,9116,9116#msg-9116 MichaelG
[b]Great[/b] product - thanks!

I couldn't get the Ignore LAN Traffic option to work, for ages - it gave the "Error in initialisation: Driver error: 7" error message, then allowed me to check the box and put in the IP ranges (but still didn't actually ignore the LAN traffic!).

Eventually, I discovered that the Portable package doesn't contain pssdk42.sys!

I then installed the installable version, made a backup of pssdk42.sys, uninstalled the installable, restored the backup of pssdk42.sys to c:\windows\system32\drivers, and now the portabel version runs fine. (I haven't tested it with pssdk42.sys in the same folder as the portable files, but this would then be a very easy fix).

Anyway, I thought I would share the info here, in case others have the same issue. Or maybe there is a simple thing I did wronmg originally?

Cheers,

Michael...]]> NetWorx http://www.softperfect.com/board/read.php?8,9116,9116#msg-9116 Thu, 11 Mar 2010 21:06:47 -0500 http://www.softperfect.com/board/read.php?8,9115,9115#msg-9115 TonyP
Because of February the present ISP month started on 1st March. However Networx [b]My Quota[/b] window shows the Period as 28/02/2010 - 29/03/2010. Assuming these to be inclusive dates this is 1 day longer than the actual quota month this time round.

Yes, I know it's a nuisance having an awkward quote month start day, but that's the way it is.:)]]> NetWorx http://www.softperfect.com/board/read.php?8,9115,9115#msg-9115 Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:54:52 -0500 http://www.softperfect.com/board/read.php?7,7894,9114#msg-9114 Lucas Alexandre
This app (BWM) will be discontinued?]]> SoftPerfect Bandwidth Manager http://www.softperfect.com/board/read.php?7,7894,9114#msg-9114 Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:39:53 -0500 http://www.softperfect.com/board/read.php?13,9113,9113#msg-9113 arie kadarusman help pls .. thanks before :D]]> SoftPerfect Personal Firewall http://www.softperfect.com/board/read.php?13,9113,9113#msg-9113 Thu, 11 Mar 2010 04:14:43 -0500 http://www.softperfect.com/board/read.php?7,5731,9112#msg-9112 Rahul Singh Rathaure
The complete solution of "block the UltraSurf" is [url=http://blog.zemana.com/2009/01/zemana-anti-ultrasurf.html]AntiUltraSurf[/url] a small software. You can download this from below given link.

this is 100% work for me. Tested

http://blog.zemana.com/2009/01/zemana-anti-ultrasurf.html

[url=http://techtouchindia.blogspot.com]My Blog in Hindi Language[/url]]]> SoftPerfect Bandwidth Manager http://www.softperfect.com/board/read.php?7,5731,9112#msg-9112 Wed, 10 Mar 2010 21:49:16 -0500 http://www.softperfect.com/board/read.php?7,9111,9111#msg-9111 Ben I have a computer with a shared internet connection which we need to establish quotas for the lan users. Using version 2.9 I looked up all the MAC addresses by IP, and nothing registers as uploaded or downloaded. I changed one of the computers to IP address, which then was logged in Bandwidth Monitor until the quota (1MB for testing) was exceeding. However after the quota is exceeded the computer is still fully capable of using the internet connection even though it is listed as suspended. I have tried switching around about everything, including just plain blocking all IP's and all ports, and just can't get this to work, at all.... 90% of the time it doesn't even monitor traffic.
No firewalls, proxy servers, etc etc running.

[img]http://i44.tinypic.com/34qmzo1.jpg[/img]]]> SoftPerfect Bandwidth Manager http://www.softperfect.com/board/read.php?7,9111,9111#msg-9111 Wed, 10 Mar 2010 20:43:05 -0500 http://www.softperfect.com/board/read.php?7,9087,9110#msg-9110 Quicksilversvc
Tim Reed
quicksilversvc@gmail.com or
treed@quicksilversvc.net]]> SoftPerfect Bandwidth Manager http://www.softperfect.com/board/read.php?7,9087,9110#msg-9110 Wed, 10 Mar 2010 15:20:12 -0500 http://www.softperfect.com/board/read.php?7,9087,9109#msg-9109 shunt010
I can say that 3 years ago it was the best software on the market for the job, and 3 years later it is still by far the best software on the market for the job.]]> SoftPerfect Bandwidth Manager http://www.softperfect.com/board/read.php?7,9087,9109#msg-9109 Wed, 10 Mar 2010 13:44:41 -0500 http://www.softperfect.com/board/read.php?7,9108,9108#msg-9108 Anonymous
Latest BWM lite installed on Vista machine to control about 20 computers. Rules were setup using MAC method (earlier using IP method). Printer is IP based and each computer on network has printer driver installed. Earlier things were working great. Now I notice unless static IPs were given in Vista PCs, they won't print. XP machines have no problems.

I simply made 20 rules with Source as MAC and destination as ANY IP. I suspect I might need to make one rule just for printer (192.168.0.215).

Any ideas?

Great program and keep up the good work.

Thanks.]]> SoftPerfect Bandwidth Manager http://www.softperfect.com/board/read.php?7,9108,9108#msg-9108 Wed, 10 Mar 2010 00:33:37 -0500 http://www.softperfect.com/board/read.php?8,9081,9107#msg-9107 Psybernaut -------------------------------------------------------
> As to the sticky user selection, I think it is
> more reasonable to have All users shown by
> default, because should one forget about the
> selection, this would lead to a mistaken
> underestimation of the usage (as there would be
> only one user's usage shown).

I undestand, but it would still be nice to have a choice. Consider the scenario where there are 2 young kids in the house. As an excersise in responsibility, they have to try and keep to within an allowed bandwidth. Therefore, it would be better if they didn't see the total by default, but only their own. I then see the totals, and if necessary, can see the induvidual ones as well.]]> NetWorx http://www.softperfect.com/board/read.php?8,9081,9107#msg-9107 Tue, 09 Mar 2010 18:41:52 -0500 http://www.softperfect.com/board/read.php?13,9092,9106#msg-9106 daveashfield The other is Tuneup Utilities 2009 and this also warns me that I have no firewall installed.

sincerely
daveashfield]]> SoftPerfect Personal Firewall http://www.softperfect.com/board/read.php?13,9092,9106#msg-9106 Tue, 09 Mar 2010 14:26:33 -0500 http://www.softperfect.com/board/read.php?7,9077,9104#msg-9104 pjred
I don't use ICS, I run in Bridge mode, and apply rules to modem side, not LAN side.]]> SoftPerfect Bandwidth Manager http://www.softperfect.com/board/read.php?7,9077,9104#msg-9104 Mon, 08 Mar 2010 16:35:32 -0500 http://www.softperfect.com/board/read.php?7,9077,9103#msg-9103 pjred
When I had a global upload rate for everyone, I had no penalties applied to that rate.

When I went to the format say 100000:10000, then the penalties I had set for downloads also were applied to the uploads. If the penaltiy (either long transfer or multiple connection) was set at 10%, then this would slow a 10k upload speed to a 1k upload. This would then send "O" in the I/O queue into an upward spiral till it reached it's limit.

When the queue reaches 500, it would stay there and wouldn't fall back to zero...unless...

Restarting the service reset it back to zero and got things going again for that user.

Changing their rule to unlimited would get them browsing again but the queue would stay at 500. If you then edited rule back to 100000:10000 (in quota manager), then they stopped browsing again. But if you edited rule to 100000 (without the colon and seperate upload speed) then the queue would come back down to zero. Similar thing would happen to the "I" in I/O if you overloaded it with downloads.

Have to run now but will post ruleset bit later.]]> SoftPerfect Bandwidth Manager http://www.softperfect.com/board/read.php?7,9077,9103#msg-9103 Mon, 08 Mar 2010 14:33:32 -0500 http://www.softperfect.com/board/read.php?7,9087,9102#msg-9102 Quicksilversvc
Tim]]> SoftPerfect Bandwidth Manager http://www.softperfect.com/board/read.php?7,9087,9102#msg-9102 Mon, 08 Mar 2010 13:10:39 -0500 http://www.softperfect.com/board/read.php?8,8988,9101#msg-9101 hm_aapje NetWorx http://www.softperfect.com/board/read.php?8,8988,9101#msg-9101 Mon, 08 Mar 2010 11:07:23 -0500 http://www.softperfect.com/board/read.php?7,9077,9100#msg-9100 Andrew
1) Post here a complete ruleset (save it to a XML file, ZIP and attach to the message)

2) Describe what happens when the queue reaches 500. When this occurs does it fall back eventually or it stays 500 for a long while until restarted?]]> SoftPerfect Bandwidth Manager http://www.softperfect.com/board/read.php?7,9077,9100#msg-9100 Mon, 08 Mar 2010 05:05:42 -0500 http://www.softperfect.com/board/read.php?7,8855,9099#msg-9099 Andrew SoftPerfect Bandwidth Manager http://www.softperfect.com/board/read.php?7,8855,9099#msg-9099 Mon, 08 Mar 2010 05:00:32 -0500 http://www.softperfect.com/board/read.php?7,9087,9098#msg-9098 Andrew
As I understand you are asking about integration of BWM with your billing system. Apparently BWM doesn't know anything about user accounts, so if you would like to have automatically created rules in BWM, this would be quite a complex task. There is a XML/HTTP based interface that the BWM core provides.You can find its [url=http://www.softperfect.com/download/support/sbm_api_28.zip]description here[/url] (although not complete, this should be sufficient for practical purposes).

However, if you are okay with manually created rules, it's fairly trivial. Just create a separate rule for your office computers that will always be in place. Then simply create a rule manually for a new customers as they create an account and join the network.

Andrew.]]> SoftPerfect Bandwidth Manager http://www.softperfect.com/board/read.php?7,9087,9098#msg-9098 Mon, 08 Mar 2010 04:59:38 -0500 http://www.softperfect.com/board/read.php?8,9081,9097#msg-9097 Andrew
As to the sticky user selection, I think it is more reasonable to have All users shown by default, because should one forget about the selection, this would lead to a mistaken underestimation of the usage (as there would be only one user's usage shown).]]> NetWorx http://www.softperfect.com/board/read.php?8,9081,9097#msg-9097 Mon, 08 Mar 2010 04:44:39 -0500 http://www.softperfect.com/board/read.php?13,9092,9096#msg-9096 daveashfield
sincerely
ashfield]]> SoftPerfect Personal Firewall http://www.softperfect.com/board/read.php?13,9092,9096#msg-9096 Mon, 08 Mar 2010 03:07:56 -0500 http://www.softperfect.com/board/read.php?13,9092,9095#msg-9095 Andrew SoftPerfect Personal Firewall http://www.softperfect.com/board/read.php?13,9092,9095#msg-9095 Sun, 07 Mar 2010 19:37:50 -0500 http://www.softperfect.com/board/read.php?8,8988,9094#msg-9094 Andrew NetWorx http://www.softperfect.com/board/read.php?8,8988,9094#msg-9094 Sun, 07 Mar 2010 19:07:58 -0500 http://www.softperfect.com/board/read.php?8,8988,9093#msg-9093 hm_aapje NetWorx http://www.softperfect.com/board/read.php?8,8988,9093#msg-9093 Sun, 07 Mar 2010 14:43:32 -0500 http://www.softperfect.com/board/read.php?13,9092,9092#msg-9092 daveashfield
sincerely
ashfield.]]> SoftPerfect Personal Firewall http://www.softperfect.com/board/read.php?13,9092,9092#msg-9092 Sun, 07 Mar 2010 14:24:31 -0500 http://www.softperfect.com/board/read.php?8,9088,9091#msg-9091 Koji NetWorx http://www.softperfect.com/board/read.php?8,9088,9091#msg-9091 Sat, 06 Mar 2010 21:07:07 -0500 http://www.softperfect.com/board/read.php?7,9077,9090#msg-9090 pjred
If the queue (I/O) reaches it's limit (on either side), then the connection stops.

Bombarding the server with heaps of requests (uploading or downloading) seems to make it reach its limit quickly.

Setting uploads in the format 10000:1000, and/or settings speed limits, and/or having the multiple connection penalty, also make it reach its limit quickly.

When the queue has reached its limit and the connection stops, I found 2 ways to get it going again.

1/ Change the rule to unlimited speed (but if you put a limit back on then the connection stops again).
2/ Stop and start the service which resets the (I/O) back to zeros then you can set speed limits again.

Hope this helps....]]> SoftPerfect Bandwidth Manager http://www.softperfect.com/board/read.php?7,9077,9090#msg-9090 Sat, 06 Mar 2010 16:26:57 -0500 http://www.softperfect.com/board/read.php?8,9088,9089#msg-9089 Andrew NetWorx http://www.softperfect.com/board/read.php?8,9088,9089#msg-9089 Sat, 06 Mar 2010 08:04:08 -0500 http://www.softperfect.com/board/read.php?8,9088,9088#msg-9088 Koji
Then I turned off utorrent and saw the number plunge down to 1.5~ kbps, with only an irc chat and IM client running. Seemed pretty normal. then it shot up to 600 kbps. Then 400 MEGABYTES per second. It topped out at 1.17 gbps.

Am I doing something wrong?]]> NetWorx http://www.softperfect.com/board/read.php?8,9088,9088#msg-9088 Sat, 06 Mar 2010 07:59:03 -0500