New beta version 3.4
Started by Andrew
Robert Lee
New beta version 11 June 2013, 23:49 |
Maximization
New beta version 13 June 2013, 09:35 |
Was planning to try Ram disk software for a year and have a new system to actually try it. I want to see how this beta works in Windows 8. I have duel HD , Duel OS's, I am using Windows 8 for fun, I am keeping Vista 64 Ultimate for work stuff. Since I have never set up a ram disk I am sure I will mess up, from what I have read I plan on setting up a cache drive for speed to lower HD usage.
specs for my system
Intel Core i7 3820
G.Skill F3-12800CL10-8GBXL
size: 64 GBytes
HZ281H HANNS-G 27.5"
RAVEN 03
RAMPAGE IV EXTREME
WESTERN DIGITAL WD5000HHTZ-0
Antec Kühler H20 920
AMD Radeon HD 7870 Series Diamond multimedia(x2)
VISTA 64 ULTIMATE
SEASONIC SS-850KM ACTIVE PFC F3
Maximization
New beta version 14 June 2013, 08:35 |
Cloud
New beta version 14 June 2013, 11:18 |
Maximization
New beta version 21 June 2013, 14:19 |
LordJZ
New beta version 23 June 2013, 19:33 |
tridex
New beta version 26 June 2013, 09:01 |
New beta version 27 June 2013, 10:48 |
Registered: 11 years ago Posts: 7 |
speed8
New beta version 27 June 2013, 14:23 |
New beta version 27 June 2013, 14:58 |
Registered: 11 years ago Posts: 7 |
New beta version 27 June 2013, 15:15 |
Registered: 11 years ago Posts: 7 |
Jyro117
New beta version (Windows 8.1) 28 June 2013, 05:06 |
LordJZ
New beta version (Windows 8.1) 28 June 2013, 07:13 |
Ferman
New beta version (Windows 8.1) 29 June 2013, 19:28 |
Rob
BLUE SCREEN with 3.4 29 June 2013, 20:36 |
Kees
New beta version 02 July 2013, 02:16 |
New beta version 11 July 2013, 07:34 |
Registered: 12 years ago Posts: 10 |
By the way, on this system I just created a 1GB Boot RAMDisk, which mounts with only a TEMP folder. Then I saved it and compressed it with NTFS, so it only occupies 12.0KB on the HDD. It was mainly going to be used to hold MediaPortal's timeshifting files but I never got round to actually using it, other than having it mounted at boot.
. *** WARNING: Unable to verify timestamp for spvve.sys *** ERROR: Module load completed but symbols could not be loaded for spvve.sys ******************************************************************************* * * * Bugcheck Analysis * * * ******************************************************************************* Use !analyze -v to get detailed debugging information. BugCheck 1000007E, {ffffffffc0000005, fffff800033de308, fffff880009a9098, fffff880009a88f0} Probably caused by : spvve.sys ( spvve+1b6ca ) Followup: MachineOwner --------- 0: kd> !analyze -v ******************************************************************************* * * * Bugcheck Analysis * * * ******************************************************************************* SYSTEM_THREAD_EXCEPTION_NOT_HANDLED_M (1000007e) This is a very common bugcheck. Usually the exception address pinpoints the driver/function that caused the problem. Always note this address as well as the link date of the driver/image that contains this address. Some common problems are exception code 0x80000003. This means a hard coded breakpoint or assertion was hit, but this system was booted /NODEBUG. This is not supposed to happen as developers should never have hardcoded breakpoints in retail code, but ... If this happens, make sure a debugger gets connected, and the system is booted /DEBUG. This will let us see why this breakpoint is happening. Arguments: Arg1: ffffffffc0000005, The exception code that was not handled Arg2: fffff800033de308, The address that the exception occurred at Arg3: fffff880009a9098, Exception Record Address Arg4: fffff880009a88f0, Context Record Address Debugging Details: ------------------ EXCEPTION_CODE: (NTSTATUS) 0xc0000005 - The instruction at 0x%08lx referenced memory at 0x%08lx. The memory could not be %s. FAULTING_IP: nt!IopPerfCompleteRequest+58 fffff800`033de308 488b4cc270 mov rcx,qword ptr [rdx+rax*8+70h] EXCEPTION_RECORD: fffff880009a9098 -- (.exr 0xfffff880009a9098) ExceptionAddress: fffff800033de308 (nt!IopPerfCompleteRequest+0x0000000000000058) ExceptionCode: c0000005 (Access violation) ExceptionFlags: 00000000 NumberParameters: 2 Parameter[0]: 0000000000000000 Parameter[1]: ffffffffffffffff Attempt to read from address ffffffffffffffff CONTEXT: fffff880009a88f0 -- (.cxr 0xfffff880009a88f0) rax=0000000000000000 rbx=fffffa8006dabc88 rcx=0000000000000000 rdx=00670061006e0061 rsi=fffff880009a9400 rdi=fffffa8006dabb70 rip=fffff800033de308 rsp=fffff880009a92d0 rbp=0000000000000000 r8=0000000000000000 r9=fffffa80072ed000 r10=0000000000401802 r11=fffff880009a93a0 r12=0000000000000001 r13=ffffffff800000fc r14=fffffa801b57c870 r15=000000000000001c iopl=0 nv up ei ng nz ac pe cy cs=0010 ss=0018 ds=002b es=002b fs=0053 gs=002b efl=00010293 nt!IopPerfCompleteRequest+0x58: fffff800`033de308 488b4cc270 mov rcx,qword ptr [rdx+rax*8+70h] ds:002b:00670061`006e00d1=???????????????? Resetting default scope CUSTOMER_CRASH_COUNT: 1 DEFAULT_BUCKET_ID: WIN7_DRIVER_FAULT PROCESS_NAME: System CURRENT_IRQL: 0 ERROR_CODE: (NTSTATUS) 0xc0000005 - The instruction at 0x%08lx referenced memory at 0x%08lx. The memory could not be %s. EXCEPTION_PARAMETER1: 0000000000000000 EXCEPTION_PARAMETER2: ffffffffffffffff READ_ADDRESS: GetPointerFromAddress: unable to read from fffff80003512100 GetUlongFromAddress: unable to read from fffff800035121c0 ffffffffffffffff FOLLOWUP_IP: spvve+1b6ca fffff880`02c426ca ?? ??? BUGCHECK_STR: 0x7E LAST_CONTROL_TRANSFER: from fffff88002c426ca to fffff800033de308 STACK_TEXT: fffff880`009a92d0 fffff880`02c426ca : fffffa80`1b5997f0 00000000`00000000 fffff880`009a9450 20206f49`00000001 : nt!IopPerfCompleteRequest+0x58 fffff880`009a9380 fffffa80`1b5997f0 : 00000000`00000000 fffff880`009a9450 20206f49`00000001 00000000`00000000 : spvve+0x1b6ca fffff880`009a9388 00000000`00000000 : fffff880`009a9450 20206f49`00000001 00000000`00000000 fffff880`02c421d6 : 0xfffffa80`1b5997f0 SYMBOL_STACK_INDEX: 1 SYMBOL_NAME: spvve+1b6ca FOLLOWUP_NAME: MachineOwner MODULE_NAME: spvve IMAGE_NAME: spvve.sys DEBUG_FLR_IMAGE_TIMESTAMP: 51a82acd STACK_COMMAND: .cxr 0xfffff880009a88f0 ; kb FAILURE_BUCKET_ID: X64_0x7E_spvve+1b6ca BUCKET_ID: X64_0x7E_spvve+1b6ca Followup: MachineOwner --------- 0: kd> lmvm spvve start end module name fffff880`02c27000 fffff880`02c90000 spvve T (no symbols) Loaded symbol image file: spvve.sys Image path: \??\C:\Program Files\SoftPerfect RAM Disk\spvve.sys Image name: spvve.sys Timestamp: Fri May 31 10:15:01 2013 (51A82ACD) CheckSum: 0006FFD2 ImageSize: 00069000 Translations: 0000.04b0 0000.04e4 0409.04b0 0409.04e4 0: kd> lmvm spvdbus start end module name fffff880`03f60000 fffff880`03f85000 spvdbus (deferred) Image path: \SystemRoot\system32\DRIVERS\spvdbus.sys Image name: spvdbus.sys Timestamp: Fri May 31 10:15:00 2013 (51A82ACC) CheckSum: 00028B1A ImageSize: 00025000 Translations: 0000.04b0 0000.04e4 0409.04b0 0409.04e4
Alex
New beta version 20 July 2013, 06:07 |
Alex
New beta version 23 July 2013, 23:02 |
Martigen
New beta version 24 July 2013, 11:04 |
VD:
>> I mean does this ramdisk has the possibility to
>
>No, and we aren't sure that this feature is really demanded.
Absolutely it is! This is one of the more exciting developments with RAM drives.
Just one use off the top of my head: the classic moving TMP/TEMP to the RAM drive. You've got a 16GB system, how much do you allocate? If you allocate say 4GB, it might be too little for some large operations, causing programs using TEMP to fail. Sure, so allocate say 10GB then -- but now you've got 10GB RAM locked up in the RAM drive that no other programs, disk cache, etc can use causing programs to start swapping out to disk if you run out of main memory. Neither situation is ideal.
However, with dynamic memory allocation you could set up a 14GB RAM disk and this entire area remains free for system programs while nothing is in the RAM disk. If an operation needs 5GB of TEMP, then 5GB of the RAM disk is used but the remaining space is still free memory for programs. Then, of course, as soon as the TEMP operation completes, the RAM is freed up again.
There are so many benefits to a dynamic RAM disk -- please consider it for the next version
New beta version 25 July 2013, 21:25 |
Admin Registered: 18 years ago Posts: 3 568 |
Joe Lynch
New beta version 25 July 2013, 22:44 |
Kees
New beta version 26 July 2013, 05:05 |
I'm using a disk size of 4 Gb with Harddisk emulation enabled for pagefile.sys and temp files.
Logboeknaam: System Bron: disk Datum: 25-7-2013 20:55:13 Gebeurtenis-id:32 Taakcategorie: Geen Niveau: Waarschuwing Trefwoorden: Klassiek Gebruiker: n.v.t. Computer: MS7667 Beschrijving: Het stuurprogramma heeft ontdekt dat bij het apparaat \Device\Harddisk4\DR4 schrijfcache is ingeschakeld. Hierdoor kunnen gegevens worden beschadigd. Gebeurtenis-XML: <Event xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/win/2004/08/events/event"> <System> <Provider Name="disk" /> <EventID Qualifiers="32772">32</EventID> <Level>3</Level> <Task>0</Task> <Keywords>0x80000000000000</Keywords> <TimeCreated SystemTime="2013-07-25T18:55:13.157110500Z" /> <EventRecordID>84775</EventRecordID> <Channel>System</Channel> <Computer>MS7667</Computer> <Security /> </System> <EventData> <Data>\Device\Harddisk4\DR4</Data> <Binary>0F00100001000000000000002000048001000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001000000</Binary> </EventData> </Event>
TRIDEX
New beta version july25 EXCELLENT ... 26 July 2013, 07:33 |
Works perfectly on windows server 8, 16 GB ram with 8 GB ramdisk ...
OK HAD SOME PROBLEMS
I FIXED THEM BU DELETE ALL REGISTRY KEY VALUES [REGEDIT] TO DO WITH "softperfect", FOR SOME REASON NORMAL UNISTALL DID NOT REMOVE ALL REFRENCES!
NOW WORKS LIKE A CHARM AND I GOT 20% SPEED INCREASE ON THIS VERSION!!!!
Thank you very much and good luck with future versions ...
Made my day !!!
Kees
New beta version 29 July 2013, 03:48 |
Jaga
New beta version 30 July 2013, 12:09 |
Additionally the issue I was having with Restore points not being created is fixed. Great beta version in my opinion.
Kees
New beta version 31 July 2013, 00:44 |
Ghost
exFAT format support? 31 July 2013, 03:23 |
New beta version 01 August 2013, 01:09 |
Registered: 12 years ago Posts: 10 |
I haven't had any since uninstalling it again (fingers crossed) but that might just be a coincidence.
I'm wondering if it might not be playing nice with my onboard ATI graphics, which is using 256MB UMA system RAM?
New beta version 01 August 2013, 02:21 |
Registered: 12 years ago Posts: 10 |
https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/questions/674779
It BSOD every time I tried to open Windows\Fonts or Control Panel - Fonts (or tried to search C:, which was obviously accessing Windows\Fonts), so I had to use \\PCNAME\C$\Windows\Fonts, select all 446 fonts and click Install to re-install them.
I can't help but wonder how the fonts get so messed up that they were causing BSOD though but it's probably unrelated to SoftPerfect.