Show all posts by user

Server froze after changing quota

3 years ago, by netnuti in Bandwidth Manager Forum

Lost remote server connection (server froze) when I tried to change "quota" for the rules. All customers also lost connection. Had to reboot server. Is this normal? Can this be reviewed on the software? (our server is so far from here, bad for us...)

How to backup BWM data files

3 years ago, by netnuti in Bandwidth Manager Forum

Where are the data files saved? I setup the ntbackup to backup some files every day, but I don't know the location of BWM data files (db file?). It isn't in "Program Files/BWM".

Re: Bugs in the new version

4 years ago, by netnuti in Bandwidth Manager Forum

In the USAGE REPORT current month sometimes just doesn't show. Data organization don't work properly showing just older months usage.

Re: Bugs in the new version

4 years ago, by netnuti in Bandwidth Manager Forum

The main problem in the new version: the databank is inconsistent. Sometimes I change some rule and another existent rule receives the data from the new rule. How can this be possible? Sometimes when I open rules edit, it shows properties (user e-mail etc.) from a different rule!! Then I close and open again and it shows correct data. MAC address from some rules are copied to a different rule. Us

Re: Bugs in the new version

4 years ago, by netnuti in Bandwidth Manager Forum

New issue. When click in button: "Display usage report" It´s not organized by DATE. And if we click in DATE, still not organize by date. It´s not considering 2014 as a newer year than 2013. But after we scroll down to see all dates, it seems to work normally after doing this. Please take a look! Thanks once more!

Re: Bugs in the new version

4 years ago, by netnuti in Bandwidth Manager Forum

Thank you! This fixes help a lot. I'm still using BWM everyday. If some issue happen again I describe it here. Thank you again!

Re: Bugs in the new version

4 years ago, by netnuti in Bandwidth Manager Forum

The error message itself is normal. The problem is just to close the message. MAYBE.... JUST MAYBE... If you want You can update and put a countdown in the button itself like this: "Socket Error #10054 - Connection reset by peer." "Auto Reconnecting(3) in 30... 29... 28... 27..." "(CLOSE) | (RECONNECT

Re: Bugs in the new version

4 years ago, by netnuti in Bandwidth Manager Forum

Yes!

Re: Bugs in the new version

4 years ago, by netnuti in Bandwidth Manager Forum

Thank for the fixes!! Can you fix one more? When receive disconnection message: "Socket Error #10054 - Connection reset by peer." When click in OK, this message appear again and again. Can´t close it to reconnect. Thanks!!

Re: Bugs in the new version

4 years ago, by netnuti in Bandwidth Manager Forum

One more error message. PS: Can't close this error message either. Must CTRL + ALT + DEL and close the bwm.exe process.

Re: Bugs in the new version

4 years ago, by netnuti in Bandwidth Manager Forum

This one receiving everyday.

Bugs in the new version

4 years ago, by netnuti in Bandwidth Manager Forum

Since 3.x version was released there are too many bugs on this version. GUI reporting errors on creating new rules, when add new rules it goes to the end of the rules list. When some error happen we can't close the error message. We have to CRTL + ALT + DEL and finalize the GUI and open again. Same occurs if we have some disconnection problem. I always use GUI remotely. I use BWM everyday and

Retrieving e-mail list from all rules

4 years ago, by netnuti in Bandwidth Manager Forum

How can I retrieve the email list from all rules? Thanks!

Suggestions for the new BWM 3.0

7 years ago, by netnuti in Bandwidth Manager Forum

I use BWM basically remotely, over Internet. The problem is because I have too many rules and when I try to connect or if I try to change or add rules take too much time. Maybe you can improve this system in the new version. Other problem I see is in the LIVE BANDWIDTH VIEW. Colors change fast so I cant follow one user easily. And when bwm Its updating graffic, the screen seens to be freezed and

NetCut & bwm

8 years ago, by netnuti in Bandwidth Manager Forum

BWM is not compatible with Winpcap... I already tried before and get the same problem.

Upload and Download Rates in Quota Manager

8 years ago, by netnuti in Bandwidth Manager Forum

SOLVED!!!! Hi. All my rules are linked to one quota named "limit". This quota is configured to assign initial rate of 210000 (200KB/s) and reduced rate of 21000 (20KB/s), with option "decrease transfer rate smoothly" enabled. How can I use different quota rates (for download and upload) in the same rule/quota. I already tried initial 210000:21000 and reduced 2100

Network Device Order Has Changed: Check Your Bridge

8 years ago, by netnuti in Bandwidth Manager Forum

Event Log Viewer show me this message: Network Device Order Has Changed: Check Your Bridge What happen when this occur? thx

Suggestions for the new BWM 3.0

8 years ago, by netnuti in Bandwidth Manager Forum

One more please! GUI version for Smartphones like IPHONE!!! This will support me to work anyplace anytime. For now, Im using Jaadu VNC (iPhone) to access my server and use BWM, but a little difficult and slow. You can sell it as application like in app store. THANKS!

Schedule for quota manager

8 years ago, by netnuti in Bandwidth Manager Forum

Is it possible to include schedule with timetable to quota manager, opening possibilities to use 2 or more quotas for the same rule? (eg: 2 or 3 quotas to the same rule working in different hour in the day). If possible, please do it! A lot of people needs to use different quotas for different hour in day. This will help to improve lan speed to the people when lan is in low use and to pu

AP Bridge and MAC Address (v2)

9 years ago, by netnuti in Bandwidth Manager Forum

Anyway, I solved my problem. As one friend told me before (here in this forum), is real possible to do true bridge using our APs. I changed configuration to WDS system (wireless distribution service), working without SSID. Everything works fine! My network is 100% now! Thanks!

AP Bridge and MAC Address

9 years ago, by netnuti in Bandwidth Manager Forum

As I told before, I had some problems in my lan. Using AP Edimax 7209apg access points, I cannot see MAC address of the customers connected in the client bridge access point (in lan port). I see only one mac adress for all clients (MAC of the AP). I already say this before, but news are: This weekend, I used the free software Angry IP Scanner (http://www.angryziber.com/w/Home). This soft

Wireless Access Points and MAC address in BWM

9 years ago, by netnuti in Bandwidth Manager Forum

In brazil Edimax 7209apg is very used by isp. But nobody uses original firmware. There was 2 versios of complete firmware for edimax. WAPPRO and APROUTER. This 2 firmwares basically have the same features. In aprouter you can enter in this english website: See this fiirmware simulation: See its features: » AP ROUTER NG 6.1 Requirements: --> Realtek RTL 8186 chipset based equip

Wireless Access Points and MAC address in BWM

9 years ago, by netnuti in Bandwidth Manager Forum

Im using the same access point as you! Edimax EW-7209APg and wappro v4 firmware (www.wappro.com.br). Im doing something wrong because in the server, I only see the same MAC address for various computers connected into the access point. But I thing that my lan is different from yours. Take a look: I have one access point A with omni antenna in multi-bridge. I have 2 access points B&

Wireless Access Points and MAC address in BWM

9 years ago, by netnuti in Bandwidth Manager Forum

Hello there! I have one network that connect some different buildings into the same server. Bandwidth and access is controlled by BWM. Problem is: I don´t have MAC address of people connected into bridged access points. Access points assign its own MAC address to all computers connected on it (in lan ports). Im using IP filters to this computers and using fixed ips on this computers. Pr

Using port mapping to foward people

9 years ago, by netnuti in Bandwidth Manager Forum

How to use port mapping to foward people theres have no rule?? My lan setup is: 2 bridged interfaces, INTERNET and LAN. All rules are apllied on interface INTERNET. People has free traffic on server (LAN interface) but limitted traffic to the internet. Setup for the people rules: Source: Local:Any Destination: MacAddress:Any Interface: INTERNET MIscellaneous: Invert Source Addre

Version 2.9.1 preview from November 12

9 years ago, by netnuti in Bandwidth Manager Forum

Thanks for your help! I was changed my rules changing "Any Interface" to correct local lan interface name. Anyway I continue need to use option "Invert Source Address" in all rules. Is this normal? I don´t know why this happen in this version (2.9) and in 2.8 it working normally

Version 2.9.1 preview from November 12

9 years ago, by netnuti in Bandwidth Manager Forum

I tried different rules types but nothing work. If I put something different from Any Interface in the rule, it don´t work. I don´t know how to do it... I tried too many different ways but nothing work... Maybe could you help me giving me some example, or take a look in my rules to know whats wrong. Thanks kiwi! Mario.

Version 2.9.1 preview from November 12

9 years ago, by netnuti in Bandwidth Manager Forum

Now I detected something strange too. For all rules, when I see its statistics, in Daily Data, sent data is th same volume of received data in that day. Eg: 14/02/2009 - Received: 44,3 MB / Sent 44,3 MB - TOTAL 88,6 MB 15/02/2009 - Received: 77,5 MB / Sent 77,5 MB - TOTAL 155 MB Maybe this occurs because Im using "invert source address". Don´t know! And more: In quota m

Version 2.9.1 preview from November 12

9 years ago, by netnuti in Bandwidth Manager Forum

Yes. Screen shot updated. In this case, all rules working with "Not Local" (source) only. But in version 2.8, Im using "Local:Any" in source and it working normally.

Version 2.9.1 preview from November 12

9 years ago, by netnuti in Bandwidth Manager Forum

What you mean screen shot? This? Thanks for help anyway!